Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - AO’s order is not erroneous and ...

Income Tax

November 20, 2021

Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - AO’s order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue since mark to market loss incurred by Company on revaluation of forward contracts is an allowable deduction as the loss claimed by the assessee co. was in accordance with a recognized method of accounting, the loss claimed by the assessee co. was not a notional/contingent loss, but is an actual loss and the mark-to-market loss on forward contracts has not been treated as a contingent liability in the audited financial statements. Thus, the mark-to-market loss on forward contracts cannot be said as contingent in nature. - Revision order u/s 263 set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - AO’s order is not erroneous and ...

Income Tax

November 20, 2021

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Disallowance on account of 'mark to market loss' on F&O transaction - additions deleted - AT

"Mark to Market” loss - AO did not disallow the claim of loss but CIT(A) disallowed the claim of loss - In the absence of any fact with regard to the nature of the said...

Disallowance of foreign exchange fluctuation loss - mark to market loss - There is hardly any quarrel on such DRP’s directions are binding on an Assessing Officer u/s...

Mark to market loss - Contingent loss or not - Unrealized foreign exchange forward contract losses - 'mark to market' loss on such future and forward contracts are not a...

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

Revision u/s 263 - phrase ‘prejudicial to the interest of the revenue’ - every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the...

Nature of loss - Speculative loss or normal business loss - Marked to market loss on hedging of the transaction - The Appellate Tribunal held that speculative...

Exemption granted on Invalid F-Form – Invocation of revision jurisdiction – KGST - If there was error resulting in revenue losing tax, it would be prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is of wide import and is not confined to merely loss of tax. - The term erroneous means a...

Loss on account of Mark to Market - Speculation or non speculation loss - the gross total income mainly consists of income from house property, income from capital...

Quick Updates: