Validity of demand with penalty u/s 73 of CGST Act - Petitioner ...

GST

March 23, 2024

Validity of demand with penalty u/s 73 of CGST Act - Petitioner argued that their detailed replies were not adequately considered, and they were not given an opportunity to clarify or provide further documents. The court found merit in these contentions, criticizing the proper officer for dismissing the petitioner's reply without proper assessment and for not providing opportunities for clarification. Consequently, the High court set aside the impugned order and directed the matter to be remitted for re-adjudication, emphasizing the importance of following principles of natural justice and affording parties due process.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of demand with penalty u/s 73 of CGST Act - Petitioner ...

GST

March 23, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of Conclusion of proceedings u/s 73 of the Central Good and Service Tax Act 2017 without considering the reply filed by the petitioner - The court noted that...

Validity of demand of service tax - The case involved appeals against an order regarding service tax demands and penalties. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple...

Violation of principles of natural justice - Validity of demand of GST with interest u/s 73 - the Delhi High Court addressed the petitioner's challenge against the order...

Validity of Orders passed u/s 73 - excess claim of Input Tax Credit [ITC] - Inadequate Consideration of Replies - The Court noted that the Proper Officer appeared to...

Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

Demand without issue of show cause notice - Telephone services - Demand of differential tax u/s 73 - Best Judgement Assessment u/s 72 - demand set aside - AT

Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High...

Quantum of levy of penalty - petitioner points out that 100% penalty was imposed although the show cause notice was issued u/s 73 - The High Court held that, it is clear...

Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - Liability imposed without any adjudication proceeding u/s 73 or 74 - despite disputing the liability towards...

Demand of service tax by way of statement in lieu of Show cause notice (SCN)- demand-cum-penalty - section 73 (1A) of Finance Act, 1994 is not invokable and the...

Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 - cryptic order - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments regarding the inadequacy of the impugned order. It observed...

Validity of assessment order - absence of three-month gap - The petitioner's counsel argued for a three-month gap between the show cause notice and assessment order,...

Wrongful claim of Input tax credit - bogus supply - vague SCN - SCN did contain the details about the foundation of the case - principles of natural justice - From the...

Validity of third notice issued u/s 73 of the GST Act, 2017 - the petitioner has a remedy to file reply to the show cause notice before the respondent authorities -...

Validity of SCN issued u/s 73 of the CGSTAct, 2017, for the tax period April, 2018 to March, 2019 to the extent of confirming demand along with interest and penalty -...

Quick Updates: