• 1990 (1) TMI 175 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA

  S/Shri K. Sankaraman, T.P. Nambiar, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri M.N. Biswas, SDR, for the Appellant. Shri N. Mookherjee, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per: K. Sankararaman, Member (T... ...

• 2011 (4) TMI 829 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD

  Powers of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone the delay - Held that:- The provisions of Section 9 of General Clauses Act, 1897, in terms of which the date of receipt of the order has to be excluded - If... ...

• 2015 (2) TMI 550 - CESTAT MUMBAI

  Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - delay of one day - Held that:- it is mandated that while computing the period of limitation, first day from which such period to be reckoned shall be exclu... ...

• 2003 (1) TMI 393 - CEGAT, CHENNAI

  Shri Jeet Ram Kait, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri R. Ponnusamy, Administrative Officer, for the Appellant. Shri C. Mani, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. This appeal filed by the appella... ...

• 2003 (1) TMI 321 - CEGAT, CHENNAI

  Shri Jeet Ram Kait, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri R. Ponnusamy, Administrative Officer, for the Appellant. Shri C. Mani, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. This appeal filed by the appella... ...

• 2004 (6) TMI 201 - CESTAT, CHENNAI

  S/Shri S.L. Peeran, Member (J) and Jeet Ram Kait, Member (T) [Order per : Jeet Ram Kait, Member (T) (Oral)]. - This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 137/98 (M-III), dated 27-3... ...

• 2022 (8) TMI 166 - CESTAT KOLKATA

  Refund claim - time limitation - excess payment of service tax - rejection of refund claim as barred by limitation of time on the ground of delay in filing such application by one day beyond the perio... ...

• 2002 (5) TMI 357 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI

  Shri S.S. Kang, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri S.C. Pushkarna, JDR, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order]. - When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the respondent... ...

• 1994 (8) TMI 111 - CEGAT, MADRAS

  S/Shri S. Kalyanam, V.P. Gulati, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri G. Sampath, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri R. Subramanian, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S. Kalyanam, Member (J)]. ... ...

• 1996 (5) TMI 97 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI-LB

  Justice U.L. Bhat, President, S/Shri K.S. Venkataramani, Member (T) and G.R. Sharma, Member (T) [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. - By order reported Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Collector... ...

• 1994 (3) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI

  Shri S.K. Bhatnagar, Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri S. Madhavan, Chartered Accountant, for the Appellants. Shri V.C. Bhartiya, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti... ...

• 1991 (9) TMI 212 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA

  S/Shri K. Sankararaman, T.P. Nambiar, JJ. REPRESENTED BY: Shri M.N. Biswas, SDR, for the Appellant. Shri N. Mookherjee, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : K. Sankararaman, Member ... ...

• 2023 (6) TMI 1013 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

  Refund of SAD - time bar - delay of one and two days in filing the two bills of entry - whether the refund claims filed by the appellant are barred by limitation of one year from date of payment? - H... ...

• 2023 (6) TMI 1394 - CESTAT BANGLORE

  Clandestine removal - physical stock of finished / semi-finished goods shown in the Annual Stock Statement varied when compared with the opening balance of Stock of production and clearance as per ER ... ...

• 2017 (6) TMI 883 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

  Refund of SAD - rejection on the ground that refund claims were filed after the expiry of one year as stipulated in N/N. 102/2007-Cus as amended by N/N. 93/2008-Cus dt. 01/08/2008 - Held that: - The c... ...

• 2023 (5) TMI 1022 - CESTAT BANGLORE

  Clandestine Removal - shortage of stock - Demand of differential value of the stock - various differences in the physical stock of finished/semi-finished goods shown in their statement when compared w... ...

• 2021 (2) TMI 478 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

  Cheating - allegation is that the petitioner had given a false statement before the Revenue Authorities for which the petitioner company suffered loss, as he was deprived of future business transactio... ...

• 2022 (11) TMI 684 - ORISSA HIGH COURT

  Illegal gratification/bribe - allegation against the person working in Income Tax Office as Tax Assistant - demand of rupees eight thousand from the complainant for processing the refund claim of the ... ...

• 2004 (11) TMI 606 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

  Mr Hari Shankar Prasad, J. JUDGMENT Hari Shankar Prasad, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1lth February, 2003 and dec... ...

• 2019 (3) TMI 470 - ITAT KOLKATA

  Bogus purchases and sub-contract labour expenses - notice u/s 133(6)were issued - did not respond as the notices and the same got returned unserved - certain discrepancies in the statements of parties... ...

12345