9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Jurisdiction of the court to entertain the complaint regarding alleged offences under the Companies Act, 1956. Analysis: The petitioner filed a petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the order passed by the Magistrate registering a case against them for offences under the Companies Act. The respondent-complainant alleged non-compliance with requests for documents related to shareholding details and balance sheets. The Magistrate took cognizance of the offences and ordered the issue of process against the accused. The petitioners contended that the court lacked jurisdiction due to the alleged offences not occurring within its territorial limits, as the registered office of the accused company was in Mangalore. They argued that only the Magistrate court in Mangalore had jurisdiction. The petitioners also claimed that no prima facie case existed as the requested documents had been furnished to the complainant. The judgment analyzed the jurisdiction issue in detail. The complainant's argument that the court in Bangalore had jurisdiction due to his residence was found to be unfounded. Section 621 of the Companies Act was clarified to relate to the entities authorized to file complaints, not court jurisdiction. Section 53 was cited as the relevant provision determining jurisdiction based on the location of the company's registered office. Referring to the Supreme Court's decision in H.V. Jayaram v. Industrial Credit & Investment Corpn., the judgment emphasized that the place of the company's registered office determines the place of performance of statutory duties. As the accused company's registered office was in Mangalore, the cause of action arose there, granting jurisdiction to the Magistrate court in Mangalore. The judgment cited a government notification establishing the jurisdiction of the Special Court for Economic Offences in Bangalore District, further supporting the lack of jurisdiction of the court below in Bangalore for offences occurring in Mangalore. In conclusion, the court found that the court below lacked jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and directed the return of the complaint for presentation to the Magistrate Court in Mangalore. The judgment allowed the petition and left other contentions raised by the petitioners open for future consideration.
|
