9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Petition for sanctioning a Scheme of Arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act. Analysis: The Petitioner Company sought approval for a Scheme of Arrangement between the Company and its Shareholders under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act. The Company, formerly known as W.S. Insulators of India Limited, had substantial reserves and surpluses. However, due to various factors, including the diversification process and financial obligations towards another company, W.S. Telesystems Limited (WSTL), the Petitioner Company faced accumulated losses. The proposed scheme aimed to set off irrecoverable loans and advances against the Share Premium Account to expedite the resumption of dividends to shareholders without waiting for complete loss recovery. The Petitioner Company justified the Scheme of Arrangement by highlighting that it would not prejudice creditors, dilute security for charge holders, or disrupt normal operations. The scheme was approved by the Board of Directors and received overwhelming support from equity shareholders and unanimous approval from preference shareholders. Despite no opposition or support from external parties, the Regional Director of the Department of Company Affairs raised concerns regarding the applicability of the scheme under section 78 and section 100 of the Companies Act. In response to the Regional Director's contentions, the Court analyzed the provisions of section 78, section 100, and section 390 of the Companies Act. The Court rejected the Regional Director's argument, emphasizing the wide import of the term "arrangement" under section 391. Citing precedents and legal interpretations, the Court concluded that the proposed Scheme of Arrangement, including the set-off of losses against the Share Premium Account, fell within the purview of sections 391 to 394. The Court found no objectionable features in the scheme, deemed it not against public interest, and sanctioned the arrangement, making it binding on all stakeholders. The Court directed the Petitioner Company to file a copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies and granted liberty to parties for seeking necessary directions related to the arrangement. Additionally, the Additional Standing Counsel for the Central Government was awarded a fee for their involvement in the Company Petition. Ultimately, the Court approved the Scheme of Arrangement, ensuring its enforceability and compliance with the Companies Act.
|
