Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2006 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (10) TMI 225 - HC - Companies Law

Issues:
Determining whether an appeal against a decision or order of the Company Law Board should be entertained by a Single Judge or a Division Bench of the High Court.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Jurisdiction of Single Judge vs. Division Bench
The main issue in this judgment revolves around the jurisdiction of the High Court in entertaining appeals from decisions or orders of the Company Law Board (CLB) under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956. The judgment clarifies that the appeal should be entertained and decided by a Single Judge rather than a Division Bench. This conclusion was reached after a detailed analysis of relevant legal provisions and precedents.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Previous Judgments
The judgment extensively discusses and interprets previous judgments, particularly referring to the case of Stridewell Leathers (P.) Ltd. The court highlights the context in which certain observations were made by the Apex Court in Stridewell Leathers (P.) Ltd.'s case and emphasizes that those observations were not applicable to appeals from decisions of the CLB to the Division Bench. The court concludes that the observations made in the Stridewell Leathers (P.) Ltd.'s case were in a different context and do not support the view that appeals from the CLB should be heard by the Division Bench.

Issue 3: Legal Provisions and Rules
The judgment also delves into the legal provisions and rules governing the jurisdiction of the High Court in hearing appeals under local or special Acts. It specifically mentions Chapter I, rule 2(I)(a)(v) of the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960, which mandates that appeals from orders under local or special Acts should be entertained by a Single Judge. The court emphasizes the importance of adhering to these rules in determining the appropriate forum for hearing appeals from decisions of the CLB.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the judgment clarifies that appeals from decisions or orders of the CLB, filed under section 10F of the Companies Act, should be entertained and disposed of by a Single Judge of the High Court. The court directs that the appeal in question be returned to the learned Single Judge dealing with company matters for further proceedings in accordance with the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates