9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Confiscation of foreign origin gold biscuits and Maruti Car. 2. Imposition of penalties on the appellants. 3. Burden of proof regarding the origin of the gold biscuits. 4. Reliability of confessional statements. 5. Ignored documentary evidence of valid purchase. 6. Legal value of statements and procedural irregularities. Analysis: 1. The judgment involves the confiscation of foreign origin gold biscuits and a Maruti Car, along with the imposition of penalties on the appellants. The police initially intercepted the car and recovered 40 gold biscuits of foreign origin from the occupants. The customs authorities later took custody of the biscuits, leading to the show cause notices and the subsequent order of confiscation and penalties by the Commissioner. 2. The burden of proof regarding the origin of the gold biscuits was a crucial issue. The appellants argued that the burden shifted to the customs authorities since the police initially seized the biscuits. They contended that no presumption under Section 123 of the Customs Act could be drawn. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents, including the Apex Court judgment in Gyan Chand v. State of Punjab, emphasizing the need for the department to prove the smuggled nature of the goods. The lack of evidence supporting the smuggling of the gold biscuits was highlighted. 3. The reliability of the confessional statements made by the appellants was questioned. The appellants argued that the statements were obtained under duress and were retracted later. The Tribunal noted procedural irregularities, such as the lack of signatures by a gazetted officer on the statements, casting doubt on their legal value. The Tribunal also highlighted discrepancies in the actions of the customs officers, further undermining the reliability of the statements. 4. The appellants presented documentary evidence of a valid purchase of the gold biscuits from a jeweler. The statements of the jeweler confirmed the sale through invoices issued to the appellants. The Tribunal accepted the version of the appellants, noting the absence of evidence contradicting the lawful possession of the gold biscuits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the documentary evidence in establishing the legitimate acquisition of the goods. 5. Procedural irregularities and legal value of statements were significant concerns in the judgment. The Tribunal criticized the actions of the customs officers, including incorrect record-keeping and the questionable circumstances surrounding the recording of statements. The Tribunal highlighted the involuntary nature of the statements due to the custody of the appellants during the recording process. Legal precedents were cited to support the argument that the statements lacked legal value and could not be considered substantial evidence in the case. By thoroughly analyzing each issue, the Tribunal provided a comprehensive assessment of the case, considering legal principles, precedents, and the specific circumstances surrounding the confiscation of the gold biscuits and the imposition of penalties on the appellants.
|
