9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Addition of share application money under section 68. Analysis: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal was against the order confirming the addition of Rs. 3,17,000 as share application money by invoking section 68. The assessee argued that the issue was similar to a Supreme Court decision in the case of CIT v. Steller Investment Ltd., where it was held that an increase in subscribed capital cannot be considered undisclosed income even if the subscribers were not genuine. The Tribunal noted that the issue was identical to the Steller case and rejected the contention that the decision was not directly applicable to a private limited company. The Tribunal relied on another decision in the case of CIT v. Down Town Hospital (P.) Ltd. where a similar issue was decided in favor of a private limited company, following the Steller case. Consequently, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal. This judgment primarily revolved around the interpretation and application of section 68 regarding the addition of share application money. The Tribunal considered the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the Steller case, emphasizing that an increase in subscribed capital cannot automatically be deemed as undisclosed income, even if the genuineness of subscribers is questioned. The Tribunal also addressed the argument regarding the applicability of the Steller case to private limited companies, relying on the decision in the Down Town Hospital case to support its conclusion in favor of the assessee. By aligning with the decisions of higher courts, the Tribunal provided a thorough analysis to support its ruling in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents in tax matters.
|
