Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2008 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2008 (5) TMI 457 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Set-off of loss from an industrial unit eligible for deduction under section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Treatment of various incomes (interest income, training fees, and income from sale and purchase of software) in relation to section 10B.
3. Disallowance under section 35D of the Income-tax Act.
4. Working of book profit under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Set-off of Loss from an Industrial Unit Eligible for Deduction under Section 10B:

The primary issue was whether the loss from an industrial unit eligible for deduction under section 10B could be set off against other income. The assessee, engaged in software development, reported a loss of Rs. 2,69,822 after adjustments. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee included interest income of Rs. 57,31,948 in the Profit & Loss Account and had set off the loss of Rs. 43,65,916 against other incomes. The AO contended that the assessee needed to file a declaration under section 10B(8) to opt out of section 10B benefits, which the assessee had not done. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's view, stating that profits and gains from section 10B units do not form part of total income, thus disallowing the set-off.

Upon appeal, it was clarified that section 10B allows deduction from the total income, implying that profits or losses from such units are part of total income. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in concluding that profits and gains under section 10B do not form part of total income. The Tribunal emphasized that provisions of sections 70 and 71 were not excluded by section 10B, thus allowing the set-off of losses against other income. The decision was supported by a previous Tribunal ruling in the case of Mindtree Consulting (P.) Ltd. and the unreported decision in Navin Bharat Industries Ltd.

2. Treatment of Various Incomes in Relation to Section 10B:

The second issue concerned whether interest income, training fees, and income from the sale and purchase of software were part of the income derived from the industrial unit eligible under section 10B. The Tribunal referenced its earlier order for assessment years 1998-99 and 2000-01, where it was held that training income is derived from the industrial unit under section 10B, but interest income, although business income, is not derived from such a unit. The Tribunal reiterated this stance, treating training income as eligible under section 10B and interest income as business income but not derived from the unit. The profit from the purchase and sale of software was not considered income derived from the industrial unit under section 10B, as it did not involve manufacturing or production in the unit.

3. Disallowance under Section 35D:

The third issue was the disallowance of Rs. 15,83,328 under section 35D. The assessee amortized an expenditure of Rs. 79,31,642 over five years, claiming 1/5th as a deduction. The AO disallowed the claim, stating the expenditure did not fall under section 35D and was capital in nature, referencing the Supreme Court judgment in Brooke Bond India Ltd. The Tribunal noted the assessee's failure to justify the claim under section 35D but allowed for the alternate claim under section 37 to be reconsidered. The matter was remitted to the AO for fresh adjudication to ascertain the nature of the expenditure.

4. Working of Book Profit under Section 115JB:

The final issue was the working of book profit under section 115JB. The AO added back Rs. 83,79,303 to the net profit as per clause (f) of the Explanation to section 115JB, but the specifics were unclear. The assessee argued that only expenditure related to income under section 10A or 10B should be added, not the loss. The Tribunal found that the AO failed to apply the provisions of section 115JB correctly, particularly clause (ii) of the Explanation, which requires reducing income related to section 10B units credited to the Profit & Loss Account. The matter was remitted to the AO for fresh adjudication, ensuring the correct application of the Explanation to section 115JB.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the AO to allow the set-off of losses from the section 10B unit against other incomes, correctly classify various incomes in relation to section 10B, reconsider the disallowance under section 35D, and correctly work out the book profit under section 115JB.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates