2002 (2) TMI 89 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Whether claims u/s 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are separate and distinct after the amendments by the Finance Act, 1985.

Summary:

1. Distinction Between Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia):
The court examined whether the claims u/s 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are separate and distinct following the amendments by the Finance Act, 1985. The respondent-assessee, a scheduled bank, was allowed deductions for bad debts u/s 36(1)(viia) for rural branches and u/s 36(1)(vii) for urban branches. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directed a de novo assessment to verify the bad debts' relation to urban branches. The Tribunal found that the bad debt amounting to Rs. 7,88,847 was written off in the books for the assessment year 1986-87 but was disallowed as premature. Subsequent events confirmed the debt's irrecoverability in the assessment year 1987-88.

2. Provisions and Amendments:
The court analyzed the relevant provisions, including section 36(1)(vii) which allows deductions for bad debts established as irrecoverable in the previous year, and section 36(1)(viia) which provides for deductions for provisions for bad and doubtful debts made by scheduled banks. The proviso to section 36(1)(vii) limits the deduction to the amount exceeding the credit balance in the provision for bad and doubtful debts account.

3. Tribunal's Findings:
The Tribunal concluded that the bad debt written off in the assessment year 1986-87 became irrecoverable in the assessment year 1987-88. The Tribunal held that the assessee-bank was entitled to the deduction for the bad debt of Rs. 7,88,847 for the assessment year 1987-88, as it was a premature claim for the assessment year 1986-87.

4. Legal Principles:
The court referred to the principle that if an assessee's income falls under two exempting sections, they are entitled to rely on both unless they are mutually exclusive. The court cited decisions from the apex court supporting this principle.

5. Conclusion:
The court found that sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are separate and distinct. The amount of bad debt written off in the books for the assessment year 1986-87 cannot be debited against the provision for bad and doubtful debts for the assessment year 1987-88. The Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction for the bad debt of Rs. 7,88,847 for the assessment year 1987-88 was upheld. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.