9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issue involved in this case is whether the income from letting out of a building should be assessed as business income or as income from house property. Summary: The assessee-company offered the rental income of the building as business income, claiming that the income from letting out should be treated as business income due to the nature of its business activities. The Assessing Officer, however, considered the entire income from the property as assessable under the head "Income from house property" u/s 22 of the Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this decision. On further appeals, the Tribunal held that the income from letting out of the building is business income, not income from house property, based on the intention to enjoy the building along with amenities, following relevant Supreme Court decisions. The High Court initially remitted the matter to the Tribunal to reconsider the issue, citing the need for materials to show that the property was treated as commercial assets. Upon reconsideration, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the property was used exclusively for commercial purposes and leased out to commercial tenants. The Revenue challenged this decision, arguing that the income should be assessed as income from house property u/s 22 of the Act. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, emphasizing that the Revenue must establish ownership of the property and whether there was exploitation of the property by giving it away for rent before assessing rental income as income from house property. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for further consideration, with both parties allowed to present relevant judgments before the Tribunal. In conclusion, the High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal's order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer to determine the nature of the income derived from letting out the property.
|
