Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2000 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (10) TMI 9 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Classification of income from purchase and sale of units as business activity or investment activity.
2. Allowability of expenditure incurred for preserving and protecting title to purchased units under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act.
3. Deduction of expenditure on stamp paper for registering purchaser's name with Unit Trust of India under section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The Tribunal held that the dividend income from units cannot be segregated and considered as income from other sources, classifying it as business income. Referring to the decision in G. Venkataswami Naidu and Co. v. CIT, it was established that the income obtained from the Unit Trust can be treated as income from profession or business. The nature of the transaction and intention to resell at a profit were crucial factors in determining the character of the income.

Issue 2:
Regarding the expenditure incurred for stamp paper, the Revenue contended it was capital expenditure as it was necessary for registering the units. However, the assessee argued that the registration was essential for receiving dividends directly from the Unit Trust of India. The court analyzed the purpose of registration as per the Agents' Manual, concluding that the amount spent for registration was part of acquiring the units, thus constituting capital expenditure.

Issue 3:
The court answered the questions referred as follows: Question 1 was answered in favor of the assessee, supporting the treatment of dividend income as business income. Questions 2 and 3 were answered in favor of the Revenue, denying the allowance of expenditure incurred for preserving title under section 37(1) and disallowing deduction for stamp paper expenditure under section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act.

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the classification of income from units as business income, upheld the capital nature of expenditure for registration, and provided detailed reasoning based on legal precedents and provisions of the Income-tax Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates