9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Justification of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's finding on undisclosed income from cash credits. 2. Existence of material evidence before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for determining undisclosed income. Analysis: 1. The case involved the assessment year 1985-86 where the assessee filed a return with cash credits totaling Rs. 3,20,760 in the name of a deceased individual, son of a director of the company. The assessee surrendered these credits on the first day of hearing before the Income-tax Officer, requesting them to be treated as business profits. However, the Income-tax Officer categorized the credits as income from other sources due to the absence of a revised return. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) noted that the assessee had no other known source of income, and the credits were surrendered promptly, leading to the conclusion that they were related to business income. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the lack of evidence indicating the deceased individual's other business activities, thereby supporting the undisclosed income from the business of the assessee. 2. The Revenue sought a reference to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, challenging the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal had earlier declined a reference, stating that the cash credits were unexplained and offered for tax to avoid penal provisions, eventually being added to the income under 'Other sources.' The Appellate Assistant Commissioner accepted the assessee's claim that the income was from business, allowing set-off against carried forward losses. The Tribunal's finding of undisclosed income from the business was based on an evaluation of the facts on record, leading to the conclusion that no material question of law arose. The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the conclusion was based on an appreciation of facts, which did not give rise to any referable question of law, resulting in the dismissal of the application for reference. In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the Revenue's application as the Tribunal's decision was deemed to be based on an evaluation of evidence and did not raise any legal questions for reference.
|
