9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Assessment based on valuation report, Reopening of assessment u/s 148, Validity of notice u/s 148.
Assessment based on valuation report: The petitioner filed his income-tax return for the assessment year 1985-86, showing the value of a house property. The assessing authority had made a reference to the Valuation Officer for assessing the value of the house property. Despite this, the assessment was completed before the valuation report was received. Subsequently, a notice u/s 148 was issued to reopen the assessment, based solely on the Valuation Officer's report. The petitioner contended that the valuation report was merely an opinion and did not provide new information to justify reopening the assessment. Reopening of assessment u/s 148: The Department issued a notice u/s 148 to reopen the assessment, alleging that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. The petitioner objected to the reopening, arguing that the reasons for reopening were not disclosed and that the valuation report alone could not be a valid basis for reopening. The petitioner also argued that the assessing authority had completed the assessment without waiting for the valuation report, indicating a lack of new information justifying the reopening. Validity of notice u/s 148: The petitioner relied on court precedents to argue that a valuation report alone cannot constitute valid information for reopening an assessment u/s 148. The court considered previous judgments that emphasized the need for reliable reasons to justify reopening an assessment. It was held that the notice issued solely on the basis of the Valuation Officer's report lacked foundation and was therefore invalid. The court quashed the notice u/s 148, citing that a notice without a proper basis cannot be sustained. The court, after considering the arguments presented and previous legal precedents, concluded that the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, solely based on the Valuation Officer's report, lacked a valid foundation. Relying on established legal principles, the court held that the notice for reopening the assessment was without merit and consequently quashed the notice. The writ petition was allowed, and there were no costs imposed in this matter.
|
