9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against allowance of rebate under section 88E of the Income-tax Act for assessment year 2006-07. Analysis: The case involved an appeal by the Department against the allowance of rebate under section 88E of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The assessee, engaged in construction and share trading, had claimed a rebate of Rs. 18,87,817. The Assessing Officer disallowed the rebate as the assessee had not filed Forms 10DB along with the return of income, as required by section 88E. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) overturned the disallowance, stating that filing the forms during assessment proceedings was sufficient. The Department contended that the conditions for rebate were not met. The Tribunal found no error in the Commissioner's decision, citing precedents where strict interpretation was required only for charging provisions. The Tribunal emphasized that the non-filing of Forms 10DB along with the return was an irregularity, not a violation, as the forms were submitted during assessment. The Tribunal noted that the rebate was based on payment of securities transaction tax, not form filing, and that post-2006-07, documents could be filed in response to a notice under section 143(2). Consequently, the Department's appeal was dismissed. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to allow the rebate under section 88E, emphasizing that the non-filing of Forms 10DB along with the return was rectified during assessment proceedings and did not invalidate the claim. The Tribunal clarified that the rebate was linked to tax payment, not form submission, and highlighted the change post-2006-07 regarding document filing requirements. The Department's appeal was rejected, affirming the allowance of the rebate for the assessment year 2006-07.
|
