Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1978 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1978 (6) TMI 158 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues:
1. Interpretation of notifications issued under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 regarding the taxation rate on hand-made washing soaps.
2. Validity of the State Government's power to withdraw a concession with retrospective effect.
3. Application of statutory force to notifications issued under section 8-A of the Act.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The case involved manufacturers of hand-made washing soaps using edible oils during a specific period of the assessment year 1971-72. The State Government issued notifications under section 8-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, reducing the sales tax rate on such soaps. The issue was whether subsequent notifications altered the concession's scope to include a combination of edible and non-edible oils, affecting the petitioners' liability for sales tax.

2. The State Government's power to withdraw a concession retrospectively was questioned. The court examined if the executive authority could modify laws with retrospective effect, especially in the absence of specific statutory provisions enabling such actions. Precedents were cited to establish that unless expressly granted by the legislature, the State Government could not issue notifications retrospectively that impact vested rights or impose obligations.

3. The judgment emphasized that notifications issued under section 8-A of the Act hold statutory force, akin to provisions in the parent statute itself. Citing relevant case law, the court declared the third notification, which adversely affected the petitioners' tax liability for the specified period, as ultra vires. It concluded that the State Government lacked the authority to alter the concession retrospectively and directed the revision of assessments in accordance with the initial notification.

In conclusion, the court allowed the petitions, setting aside the decisions of the lower authorities and directing the revision of assessments based on the original notification. The judgment clarified the limitations on the State Government's power to modify concessions retrospectively and affirmed the statutory validity of notifications issued under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates