Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1982 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1982 (2) TMI 273 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues:
Taxability of synthetic essential oils under the U.P. Sales Tax Act as "scents and perfumes" at the rate of 12 per cent.

Detailed Analysis:

The Commissioner of Sales Tax challenged the decision of the Sales Tax Tribunal, which held that synthetic essential oils sold by the dealer were not taxable under the U.P. Act as "scents and perfumes." The Tribunal, after examining samples, concluded that the oils were not covered by the entry "scents and perfumes" as they were prepared for making soaps and other scented materials, not for use as perfumes. The Tribunal reasoned that even though the oils had flavor or smell, they should be classified as oils and taxed accordingly.

The Commissioner argued that the Tribunal erred in law by determining the taxability based on personal observation rather than market perception. The court emphasized that the market perception of a commodity is crucial in tax matters, and dictionary meanings are not decisive. Referring to relevant judicial decisions, the court highlighted the importance of interpreting entries in tax schedules based on how the concerned parties in the market view the products.

The court analyzed the relevant notifications under the Act, noting that specific entries for cosmetics and scents and perfumes existed. It concluded that scents and perfumes used for cosmetic purposes were likely not intended to be covered under the general entry. The court stressed that determining whether a commodity is known as a scent or perfume in the market requires factual evidence and should not solely rely on personal observations by the authority.

Consequently, the court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the case for reconsideration in accordance with the law. The Tribunal was instructed not to make determinations based on personal observations but to consider relevant material and legal principles. The parties were directed to bear their own costs, and the petition was allowed for the case to be remanded for fresh decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates