9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (8) TMI 817 - AT - Income TaxAO passed u/s 143(3) - Rejection of books of accounts - HELD THAT - The sale and purchase of the assessee is vouched and verifiable. The assessee has also maintained quantitative details in respect of diamonds purchased and sold by it as well as for processing of diamond. There is no adverse comment from the auditor that the profit cannot be computed from the books of accounts maintained by the assessee. In our opinion, the qualitative details of each piece of diamond is not necessary for computation of the income of the assessee. Income of the assessee can be very well computed on the basis of accounts already maintained by the assessee. In view of the above, we are unable to agree with the AO that there is defect in the system of method of accounting of the assessee which requires rejection of the book results u/s 145(3) and estimation of the GP. Valuation of the closing stock - HELD THAT - No mistake in the valuation of the closing stock by the AO was pointed out by the learned counsel. We therefore accept the value of the closing stock determined by the AO. However, accepting the alternate plea of the learned counsel, we direct that the value of the closing stock will be taken as value of opening stock of the next year. Thus, the addition of Rs.46,16,251/- made by the AO to the valuation of the closing stock is upheld. The direction of the CIT(A) to make the addition by working out the net profit at the rate of 4% is hereby quashed. charging of interest u/s 234B and 234C - HELD THAT - Both the parties agreed that it is consequential, we therefore direct the AO to recalculate the interest, if any, after determination of the income as per order. In the result, assessee s appeal is partly allowed.
Issues Involved:
1. Rejection of book results by the Assessing Officer (AO). 2. Addition of Rs. 46,16,251 as undervaluation of closing stock. 3. Enhancement of income by CIT(A) to 4% of net profit. 4. Charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act. Detailed Analysis: 1. Rejection of Book Results by the Assessing Officer (AO): The AO rejected the assessee's valuation of closing stock, citing suppression in the value by Rs. 46,16,251 and a fall in the Gross Profit (GP) rate compared to the preceding year. The AO adopted a GP rate of 7.19% against the disclosed 6.94%, resulting in a GP addition of Rs. 19,49,526. However, the AO did not make any addition on account of low GP in the final computation of income, as the addition to the closing stock was more significant. The CIT(A) upheld the rejection of the books of accounts and directed a net profit rate of 4%, which the assessee contended amounted to an enhancement of income. The assessee argued that maintaining qualitative details for each diamond was impractical and that the books of accounts were regularly maintained, audited, and verifiable. The Tribunal noted that the primary records were not produced for examination, and the detailed inventory of the stock in terms of quality was not furnished, leading to the rejection of the book results by the AO. 2. Addition of Rs. 46,16,251 as Undervaluation of Closing Stock: The AO estimated the value of closing stock due to the absence of qualitative details. The assessee maintained that the valuation was proper and detailed, accepted by auditors, and argued that it was impractical to maintain qualitative details for each diamond. The Tribunal observed that the assessee failed to furnish details of the closing stock and its valuation, making it impossible for the AO to verify the correctness. The assessee's counsel could not point out any mistake in the AO's valuation. The Tribunal upheld the AO's valuation of the closing stock but accepted the alternate plea that the closing stock value for this year should be the opening stock value for the next year. 3. Enhancement of Income by CIT(A) to 4% of Net Profit: The CIT(A) directed an enhancement of income by estimating the net profit at 4%, which the assessee argued was arbitrary and excessive. The Tribunal found that the AO's rejection of the books of accounts and estimation of GP was not justified due to the impracticality of maintaining qualitative details for each diamond. The Tribunal concluded that the income could be computed based on the accounts already maintained by the assessee, which were regularly audited and verifiable. Thus, the Tribunal quashed the CIT(A)'s direction to enhance the income by estimating the net profit at 4%. 4. Charging of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act: The assessee's appeal included a ground against the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C. Both parties agreed that the charging of interest was consequential. The Tribunal directed the AO to recalculate the interest, if any, after determining the income as per the Tribunal's order. Conclusion: The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal. It upheld the AO's addition of Rs. 46,16,251 to the valuation of the closing stock but directed that this amount be taken as the opening stock value for the next year. The Tribunal quashed the CIT(A)'s direction to enhance the income by estimating the net profit at 4% and directed the AO to recalculate the interest under Sections 234B and 234C after determining the income as per the Tribunal's order.
|
