1998 (2) TMI 565 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 regarding exemption for sale of packing materials in relation to export.
2. Application of previous judicial decisions on similar matters to the current case.
3. Determination of whether the sale of packing materials by the assessee is exempt under section 5(3) of the Act.

Analysis:
The judgment of the Madras High Court, delivered by Justice N.V. Balasubramanian, pertains to a tax revision filed against an order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The case involved an assessee who was assessed for the year 1977-78, with a disputed turnover of inter-State sales of paper boxes. The assessing officer proposed to revise the assessment due to lack of evidence of export, leading to taxation of the turnover at 10%. The assessee contended for exemption under section 5(3) of the Act, citing previous decisions and contracts with foreign buyers.

The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal both denied the exemption, holding that packing materials were not covered under section 5(3) as they were not the subject of the export contracts. The assessee then appealed to the High Court, arguing that the packing materials were essential for complying with the export agreement and should be exempt under section 5(3).

The High Court analyzed section 5(3) of the Act, emphasizing the phrase "for the purpose of complying with the agreement or order for or in relation to such export." The court held that the sale of packing materials was integral to complying with the export agreement for frozen sea foods. The court distinguished previous cases and ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the sale of packing materials was exempt under section 5(3) as it was necessary for the export process.

The court referenced decisions in State of Tamil Nadu v. Catherene Traders and Kusum Laminating & Packaging Industries to support its interpretation. It concluded that both conditions under section 5(3) were satisfied in the present case, overturning the Tribunal's decision and allowing the tax case revision in favor of the assessee.