Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + SC Customs - 1986 (9) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1986 (9) TMI 401 - SC - Customs

Issues: Interpretation of previous court judgments and their binding effect, entitlement to Export House Certificates, clearance of goods based on court decisions, clarification on importation of canalised items, validity of government letters in light of court directions.

In this judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India, the Court addressed the issue of the binding effect of previous court judgments on parties not directly involved in those proceedings. The Court emphasized that decisions of the Court laying down legal positions are binding on all parties, regardless of whether they were parties to the original proceedings or served with notices. The Court referred to specific cases like Raj Prakash's case and Indo Afghan Chamber of Commerce's case to support this principle.

Regarding the entitlement to Export House Certificates, the Court discussed a case where the Government wrongfully refused to grant these certificates to exporters who had not diversified their exports. The Court, following decisions of various High Courts, held that such refusal was incorrect. The Court directed the Government to issue necessary Export House Certificates within a specified timeframe and allowed importation of items except those specifically banned under the prevalent import policy at the time of import.

The judgment also clarified the importation of canalised items, stating that both canalised and non-canalised items were covered within the ambit of the Court's order. The Court highlighted that a subsequent letter by the government, not in line with the Court's direction, did not affect the binding nature of the Court's decision or create any estoppel. The Court deemed such letters irrelevant in determining the government's understanding of the matter.

In conclusion, the Court refused the interim order prayed for in the applications before it and disposed of the applications without any orders as to costs. The judgment serves as a reminder of the binding nature of court decisions, the entitlement to Export House Certificates, and the clarification on importation rules, emphasizing the importance of following legal directions issued by the Court despite any conflicting government communications.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates