9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Interpretation of section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the allowability of additional payments made to workers under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as business expenditure. Analysis: The High Court of MADRAS deliberated on the interpretation of section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 concerning the allowability of additional payments made by an assessee-company to its workers under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as business expenditure for the assessment year 1979-80. The assessee, engaged in the manufacture of cotton yarn, claimed a deduction of Rs. 6,74,086 in its return of income, which included bonus and additional payments to employees as production incentives. The Income-tax Officer allowed a portion of the claimed amount based on the Payment of Bonus Act but disallowed the balance, contending that it contravened the Act and was not allowable under section 36(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the additional payments were not bonus but made out of commercial consideration, thus allowing the entire amount as an expenditure under section 37 of the Act. The Revenue appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which found that the additional payment was not bonus but a commercial expediency, hence deductible under section 37. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between bonus and additional payments in the settlement agreement under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The High Court analyzed the settlement agreement and concluded that the additional payments were made for better performance and smooth working of the mills, distinct from statutory bonus obligations. The Court held that the additional amount, paid beyond statutory requirements, could not be classified as bonus and was allowable under section 37 as business expenditure. It emphasized that the payment was based on commercial considerations and not subject to section 36 provisions, thus affirming the Tribunal's decision. Consequently, the Court answered the referred question in favor of the assessee, ruling that the additional amount was not bonus but a legitimate business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
