2012 (3) TMI 387 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Replacement during warranty period - Whether the replacement of parts of automobile during warranty period without collecting any price for the same from the vehicle owner amounts to sale that attracts sales tax? Held that - it is the purchase and sale of spare parts by the petitioner as authorised dealer of the manufacturer and the replacement therefor is resale effected by the petitioner for which payment is received through credit note issued by the manufacturer - free replacement of parts during warranty period amounts to sale of such parts - revision allowed - decided against assessee.

Summary

Issues:
1. Whether the replacement of parts of an automobile during the warranty period without collecting any price from the vehicle owner amounts to a sale that attracts sales tax.

Analysis:
The primary issue in this case was whether the replacement of automobile parts during the warranty period without charging the vehicle owner constituted a sale liable for sales tax. The court referred to a decision by the Supreme Court in Mohd. Ekram Khan & Sons v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P., which had ruled on a similar matter. The petitioner argued that a Rajasthan High Court decision distinguished by the Supreme Court case supported their position, stating that free replacement of parts from the manufacturer did not constitute a sale. The petitioner contended that manufacturers were obligated to replace parts during the warranty period at no cost, which should be considered covered by the original value of the vehicle. However, the Government Pleader argued that the transaction was a sale because the manufacturer did not provide parts for free replacement. The petitioner purchased spare parts in bulk, replaced them using their stock, and then claimed reimbursement from the manufacturer, who issued a credit note for the sale price. The court concluded that the transaction was a purchase and sale of spare parts by the petitioner as an authorized dealer, and the replacement constituted a resale for which payment was received through a credit note from the manufacturer. Therefore, the court upheld the decision that free replacement of parts during the warranty period amounted to a sale, dismissing the sales tax revision case.