Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1997 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1997 (8) TMI 64 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of the period of limitation prescribed in section 35 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act.
2. Determining the correct starting point for computing the period of limitation.
3. Assessing whether the Tribunal's decision on the computation of the limitation period was correct.

Analysis:
The judgment by the High Court of Madras involved a revision filed by the State against the Tribunal's order regarding the computation of the limitation period under section 35 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act. The Tribunal had determined that the limitation period should be calculated from the end of the year in which the income was earned. However, the High Court disagreed with this interpretation. It was noted that the Act defines "financial year" and "previous year" distinctly. The financial year is considered the assessment year, while the previous year is the year in which the income is earned or received. The charge under the Act is on the income of the previous year, and the tax is assessed in the financial year, which is the assessment year. Therefore, the period of limitation prescribed under section 35 should be computed from the end of the financial year or assessment year, not the previous year when the income was earned.

The court referred to the specific provisions of the Act, highlighting that the notice issued by the Assessing Officer in this case, on October 19, 1982, for revising the assessment for the year 1977-78 (with the previous year being 1976-77), fell within the five-year limitation period from March 31, 1978. The judgment emphasized that the Tribunal had erred in its interpretation and that the revision by the State was allowed based on the correct computation of the limitation period. The High Court's decision clarified the distinction between the financial year and the previous year under the Act, emphasizing that the limitation period for assessing escaped income should start from the end of the financial year or assessment year, ensuring the proper application of the statutory provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates