Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves the following issues: 1. Deduction of monetary value of unavailed leave for assessment years 1972-73 to 1975-76. 2. Deduction of recoverable bonus paid to employees in the assessment year 1974-75. 3. Admissibility of payments made to employees under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme for assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76.
Issue 1 - Deduction of monetary value of unavailed leave: The Department did not press this issue during the hearing, and thus no answer was rendered. Issue 2 - Deduction of recoverable bonus: The assessee paid a recoverable bonus to employees in 1971, with an agreement for subsequent recovery. However, after discussions with the union, it was decided not to recover the bonus to maintain good industrial relations. The board resolved to adjust the amount to the bonus paid account in 1974-75. The Income-tax Officer initially rejected the deduction claim, but the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal allowed it based on similar cases. The Department argued that the bonus payment must satisfy section 36(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, and there was no definite finding by the Tribunal on this. The court distinguished a previous case and held that since the facts were similar to another case where the bonus payment was allowed, the deduction was permissible. The court answered this question in favor of the assessee. Issue 3 - Payments under Voluntary Retirement Scheme: The question was whether payments made under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme were deductible. The court referred to previous cases where such payments were considered deductible as they were for business purposes, including maintaining good labor relations. Citing precedents, the court held that such payments were allowable deductions. The court answered this question in favor of the assessee based on established principles and previous judgments. In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on both the issues of deduction of recoverable bonus and payments under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, based on the facts and legal precedents.
|