2011 (5) TMI 922 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 6,08,326/- being exchange rate difference.
2. Deletion of cost of goods estimated by the AO.
3. Deletion of disclaimer amount of Rs. 4,76,10,309/- for eligible deduction u/s 80HHC.
4. Allowance of freight expenses beyond customs point amounting to Rs. 32,87,842/-.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 6,08,326/- being exchange rate difference
The assessee claimed an additional sum of Rs. 6,08,326/- received due to favorable exchange rate fluctuation as part of the current year's export turnover. The AO treated it as income from other sources, arguing it related to the previous year's exports. The CIT(A) followed precedents and held that the additional sum is part of export profits. The Tribunal directed the AO to rectify the previous year's assessment u/s 155(13) and allow the deduction u/s 80HHC for that year, thus allowing the Revenue's ground.

Issue 2: Deletion of cost of goods estimated by the AO
The AO estimated the cost of goods for determining export profit u/s 80HHC by dividing total sales and costs on a pro-rata basis. The CIT(A) upheld the assessee's method of calculating costs based on purchases rather than sales. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), stating that purchase cost is a reasonable basis for determining direct costs, and dismissed the Revenue's ground.

Issue 3: Deletion of disclaimer amount of Rs. 4,76,10,309/- for eligible deduction u/s 80HHC
The AO reduced the deduction u/s 80HHC by Rs. 4,76,10,309/- due to disclaimer certificates issued by the assessee for marine product exports. The CIT(A) directed the AO to consider division-wise profitability and proportionate reduction in the deduction u/s 80HHC(1). The Tribunal followed its earlier decision for the assessee's case for AY 1999-00 and restored the matter to the AO for re-adjudication, considering division-wise profitability and disclaimer amounts. This ground was allowed for statistical purposes.

Issue 4: Allowance of freight expenses beyond customs point amounting to Rs. 32,87,842/-
The AO initially treated Rs. 32,87,842/- as freight expenses up to the customs clearance point, but later found it was beyond the customs point. The CIT(A) clarified this and directed the AO to treat it similarly to other freight expenses beyond the customs point. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's ground.

General Grounds:
Grounds 5 and 6 were general and required no specific adjudication.

Conclusion:
The appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes.