Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2007 (9) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (9) TMI 12 - HC - Income TaxFour issue arises by the AO (i) genuineness of gift (ii)rate of gross profit is low (iii)gift received by assessee of ₹ 2.75 lakh and (iv) addition of ₹ 91,045/- in household expenses Allowed the appeal partly
Issues:
1. Genuineness of a gift of Rs.2 lakhs made to the Assessee. 2. Discrepancy in the rate of gross profit declared by the Assessee and assessed by the AO. 3. Gift of Rs.2.75 lakhs made by another individual to the Assessee. 4. Addition of Rs.91,045 towards household expenses. Analysis: 1. The first issue revolves around the genuineness of a gift of Rs.2 lakhs made to the Assessee. The Tribunal questioned the authenticity of the gift as the donor had limited contact with the Assessee and lacked knowledge about the family. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, stating that the lack of a genuine motive for the gift was evident, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court distinguished a cited case, emphasizing the Tribunal's focus on the gift's genuineness. 2. The second issue concerns the variance in the rate of gross profit declared by the Assessee and assessed by the Assessing Officer (AO). The Tribunal sided with the AO, emphasizing the Assessee's failure to provide essential accounting records. The High Court concurred, highlighting the absence of substantiating evidence for the Assessee's claims regarding a decline in the gross profit rate. The Court rejected the Assessee's reliance on a precedent, emphasizing the factual nature of determining the applicable gross profit rate. 3. Moving to the third issue, involving a gift of Rs.2.75 lakhs from another individual to the Assessee, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for further examination. Similarly, regarding the addition of Rs.91,045 towards household expenses, the Tribunal also ordered a fresh assessment by the AO. The High Court found no substantial legal question in these issues, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's decisions on various issues related to the genuineness of gifts, discrepancy in gross profit rates, and remand for further examination of certain transactions.
|