9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Stay and appeal regarding the levy of Service Tax on consumable inputs used in photography.
Issue 1: Interpretation of legal precedents The appellants were using inputs for photography, and the Revenue levied Service Tax on these consumable inputs. The Commissioner (A) distinguished a previous judgment and noted a subsequent clarification by the Board, along with an Apex Court judgment. The learned Counsel argued that the latest circular and cited judgments were already considered in a detailed judgment in a similar case, where they were distinguished. It was argued that the ratio of the previous judgment should apply in this case, warranting allowance of the stay application and appeal. Issue 2: Application of legal precedents Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal noted that the same issue was previously considered in a similar case, where the latest Board's circular and the Apex Court judgment were examined. The Tribunal found that the issue was settled in the assessee's favor in the cited judgment. Consequently, the Tribunal decided to allow the stay application and appeal, along with any consequential relief, based on the cited judgments and the settled nature of the issue.
|
