9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Penalty u/s 140A(3) for non-payment of self-assessment tax based on incorrect return and applicability of section 80VVA of the Income-tax Act.
Summary: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai involved a dispute regarding the penalty levied u/s 140A(3) for non-payment of self-assessment tax by the assessee for the assessment year 1986-87, based on the incorrect return filed. The Assessing Officer contended that the assessee avoided payment of self-assessment tax by not considering section 80VVA, limiting set off of unabsorbed depreciation to 70% of gross income. The penalty was imposed for default in paying tax on the income determined by the Assessing Officer. The CIT(Appeals) upheld the penalty, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee argued that self-assessment tax is payable only on the returned income, not on the corrected income by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal interpreted that tax is payable based on the income required to be returned, not just the income returned. Ignorance of law or bona fide mistake must be proven by the assessee to avoid penalty. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient reasons for non-payment of self-assessment tax, especially regarding the oversight of section 80VVA. Regarding the reduction of penalty, the Tribunal noted the incorrect application of penalty provisions by the Assessing Officer, as the penalty was levied @ 2% per month, contrary to the applicable provisions at the time of default. The Tribunal exercised discretion and reduced the penalty to Rs. 5,000 u/s 140A(3) for the assessment year 1986-87, finding it appropriate to meet the ends of justice. The appeal was partly allowed, considering the circumstances of the case.
|
