Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2010 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (8) TMI 1012 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of addition u/s 2(22)(e) of deemed dividend.

Summary:
The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi heard an appeal by the revenue against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 37,66,432/- u/s 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The revenue contended that the amount, treated as deemed dividend, should not have been deleted by the Ld. CIT(A). The issue revolved around whether the advance received by the assessee from its sister concern could be considered as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) due to a common shareholder. The Ld. CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, following a special bench decision of the Tribunal in a similar case.

Upon considering the rival contentions and the record, the Tribunal found that the special bench decision in a comparable case had already settled the matter. The Tribunal highlighted the intention behind the provisions of section 2(22)(e) to tax dividend in the hands of shareholders, not concerns. The Tribunal emphasized that the deeming provisions applied to loans or advances by a company to a concern in which its shareholder had substantial interest. The Tribunal concluded that deemed dividend could only be assessed in the hands of a shareholder of the lender company and not in the hands of any other person.

Based on the precedents and the interpretation of the law, the Tribunal held that the issue was squarely covered in favor of the assessee. Consequently, the appeal by the revenue was dismissed, upholding the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to delete the addition of deemed dividend. The order was pronounced in the open court on 13.8.2010.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates