9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Adjudication of penalties under section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the financial years 1997-98 and 1998-99. Analysis: The High Court addressed the issue of penalties imposed under section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the financial years 1997-98 and 1998-99. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had held that there was a reasonable cause for not depositing the tax due to short deduction. The revenue appealed this decision, arguing that the penalties imposed under section 271C should not be set aside. The High Court noted that the determination of "reasonable cause" is a question of fact, as established in the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan v. Union of India. The Court clarified that it had already examined similar aspects in other matters and found no question of law arising in the present case. Therefore, the Court dismissed the appeals solely based on the issue of "reasonable cause," emphasizing that no other aspects were considered. The Court emphasized that the determination of "reasonable cause" is a factual inquiry, and based on precedents, it was established that this issue does not raise any legal questions. The Court's decision to dismiss the appeals was solely based on the examination of whether there was a reasonable cause for not depositing the tax, as required by section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court clarified that it did not delve into any other aspects of the case, and the appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs. The judgment highlights the importance of factual considerations in assessing penalties under tax laws and the limited scope of legal review in such matters.
|
