9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for exemption u/s Notification No. 90/2004-Cus dated 10.09.2004. 2. Requirement of establishing nexus between imported goods and exported products. 3. Validity of adjudicating authority's order on confiscation, duty demand, interest, and penalties. Summary: Issue 1: Eligibility for exemption u/s Notification No. 90/2004-Cus dated 10.09.2004 The core issue was whether the Crude Palm Oil (Edible Grade) imported by the appellant was eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 90/2004-Cus dated 10.09.2004 against 7 DFRC Licences. The Tribunal noted that the DFRC licences were genuine and purchased from M/s. Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. It was undisputed that the imported goods were crude palm oil (edible grade) and not listed as sensitive items in para 4.31 of the Handbook of Procedures. The DGFT authorities had clarified that palm oil, coconut oil, and palm kernel oil are inputs required for manufacturing biscuits. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority accepted that the crude palm oil (edible grade) could be used for manufacturing biscuits after refining, thus qualifying as "intermediate" materials under Notification No. 90/2004-Cus. Issue 2: Requirement of establishing nexus between imported goods and exported products The Tribunal held that establishing a nexus between the imported goods and the exported products was not required for the transferee of the DFRC licences. This position was supported by the Tribunal's decision in the case of Ramniklal S. Ghosalia and Co., which stated that the nexus is not required to be established by the transferee of a licence. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant had purchased the DFRC licences from M/s. Parle Products Pvt. Ltd., and thus, there was no need to establish the nexus. Issue 3: Validity of adjudicating authority's order on confiscation, duty demand, interest, and penalties The adjudicating authority had ordered the confiscation of the imported Crude Palm Oil of edible grade, imposed a fine in lieu of confiscation, confirmed the customs duty short paid, ordered recovery of applicable interest, and imposed a penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority's findings were based on the incorrect premise that the crude palm oil required refining before use, which did not negate its eligibility for exemption. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the Crude Palm Oil (Edible Grade) imported by the appellant was eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 90/2004-Cus dated 10.09.2004, and there was no requirement for the appellant to establish a nexus between the imported goods and the exported products. The adjudicating authority's order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
|
