9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the assessee is entitled to the deduction of ground rent of Rs. 19,696 which pertains to the period prior to the previous year under section 9(1)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Entitlement to Deduction of Ground Rent Pertaining to Prior Periods: The primary issue revolves around whether the assessee can claim deduction for ground rent amounting to Rs. 19,696, which pertains to the period before the previous year, under section 9(1)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The assessee argued that since the demand for the arrears was made on November 1, 1957, and the liability was quantified then, the entire amount should be allowed as a deduction in the assessment year 1958-59. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal supported this claim, stating that there was no language in section 9(1)(iv) restricting the allowance to the particular year for which the assessment was made. However, the High Court emphasized that the structure of the Indian Income-tax Act is annual, meaning income and deductions are assessed on a yearly basis. The court noted that section 3 of the Act charges tax on the total income of the previous year, and each previous year is a distinct unit for assessment. Consequently, the income from property and permissible deductions under section 9 must also be considered annually. The court analyzed the various allowances under section 9, noting that most deductions, such as repairs, collection charges, and insurance premiums, are linked to the annual value of the property and are allowable irrespective of actual expenditure. Specifically, for ground rent under section 9(1)(iv), the court held that the allowable deduction is the ground rent for the previous year, regardless of whether it is paid or not. This interpretation aligns with the annual assessment structure of the Act. The court rejected the assessee's argument that ground rent should be treated differently from other charges like interest on mortgages. It clarified that the absence of the word "paid" in section 9(1)(iv) indicates that the allowance is not contingent on actual payment. The court also dismissed the argument based on the income-tax return form, stating that statutory rules cannot override clear statutory provisions. Ultimately, the court concluded that the assessee could not claim the arrears of ground rent for prior periods in the assessment year 1958-59. The allowable deduction was limited to the ground rent for the previous year only. Judgment: The High Court answered the question in the negative, ruling that the assessee is not entitled to the deduction of ground rent of Rs. 19,696 pertaining to the period before the previous year. The assessee was ordered to pay the costs of the Commissioner.
|
