Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2010 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (1) TMI 1216 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on interest and dividend.
2. Deduction u/s 80P(2)(c) of Rs. 50,000.
3. Deduction u/s 80IB on Banas-II plant.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on interest and dividend

The Revenue challenged the allowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on interest of Rs. 39,85,291 and dividend of Rs. 62,99,641. The Tribunal noted that the issue was already decided in favor of the assessee in earlier years (ITA No.3730/Ahd/2002 for AY 1990-91). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had observed that the interest and dividend were earned from investments made out of own funds, not borrowed funds. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's appeal and dismissed it.

Issue 2: Deduction u/s 80P(2)(c) of Rs. 50,000

The Revenue contested the allowance of Rs. 50,000 deduction u/s 80P(2)(c). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) noted that the assessee was not a primary cooperative society as described in section 80P(2)(b) and thus eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(c). The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the assessee's activities were not covered by clause (b) of section 80P(2). The appeal on this ground was dismissed.

Issue 3: Deduction u/s 80IB on Banas-II plant

The Revenue disputed the deduction of Rs. 82,84,339 u/s 80IB for the Banas-II plant. The assessee had revised its claim from Rs. 3,31,37,355 to Rs. 82,84,339, asserting eligibility for 25% deduction. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the deduction, referencing the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's favor for AY 2004-05. The Tribunal found no reason to deviate from the earlier decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, noting that the apportionment of common expenses would actually increase the profit of the Dairy Business, not reduce it.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue on all grounds, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding deductions u/s 80P(2)(d), 80P(2)(c), and 80IB.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates