9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: SEBI's examination of Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures and deposits invited by Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited, jurisdiction, appeal under Section 15T of SEBI Act, withdrawal of writ petition, Union of India as a party respondent, disposal of appeal by Tribunal.
SEBI's Examination of Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures: The Supreme Court directed SEBI to examine the nature of Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures and the process of deposits invited by Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited. SEBI issued an Order on 23rd June, 2011, prompting the petitioners to prefer an appeal under Section 15T of the SEBI Act before the Tribunal within three weeks. The petitioners agreed to withdraw the pending writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. The Court emphasized the importance of investor interests and the complexity of legal issues involved. Withdrawal of Writ Petition and Appeal Process: The petitioners undertook to withdraw the writ petition in the Allahabad High Court in light of the Order. They were given the opportunity to appeal under Section 15T of the SEBI Act before the Tribunal. The Court made it clear that all contentions were to be kept open and expressed no opinion on the case's merits. The Tribunal was instructed to decide the matter independently, unaffected by any previous High Court observations. Temporary Suspension of Deposits: The petitioners, through their senior counsel, assured that no further deposits would be invited pending the appeal's hearing and final disposal by the Tribunal. Consequently, SEBI's impugned Order would not be enforced until the appeal's resolution. The Court highlighted the importance of addressing significant legal questions that may arise repeatedly in similar cases. Inclusion of Union of India as a Party Respondent: In the proposed appeal, the petitioners were directed to include the Union of India, specifically the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, as a party respondent. This inclusion was deemed necessary due to the jurisdictional issue concerning the Registrar of Companies under Section 55A(c) that needed consideration. The Court stressed the need for timely disposal of the appeal by the Tribunal, setting a deadline of eight weeks from the filing date. Conclusion: The special leave petitions were disposed of accordingly, with the petitioners instructed to proceed with the appeal process before the Tribunal. The Court's directives aimed to ensure a fair and expeditious resolution of the legal issues at hand, safeguarding the interests of investors and upholding the rule of law.
|
