9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Penalties imposed under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for failure to comply with Section 44AB - Reasonable cause for failure - Applicability of Section 80P of the Act - Interpretation of audit requirements for Cooperative Societies.
Summary: Issue 1: Penalties under Section 271B of the Act The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow heard five appeals involving common issues of penalties imposed under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act for different assessment years. The ld.CIT(A) upheld the penalties, leading to appeals before the Tribunal by the assesses. Issue 2: Reasonable Cause for Failure The assesses, Cooperative Societies engaged in sugarcane marketing, claimed deductions under Section 80P of the Act. The penalties were imposed for non-compliance with Section 44AB, requiring audit of accounts. The assesses argued reasonable cause, stating they believed their income was fully deductible under Section 80P and faced delays in audit due to statutory auditor issues. Issue 3: Applicability of Section 80P The assesses contended that as their income was fully deductible under Section 80P, they were not required to comply with Section 44AB for audit purposes. They cited a High Court judgment supporting their position and argued that no tax was payable on their income, justifying the non-compliance with audit requirements. Issue 4: Tribunal Decision The Tribunal considered the assesses' arguments and found reasonable cause for their failure to comply with Section 44AB. Citing the High Court judgment, the Tribunal concluded that no penalty under Section 271B was applicable in these cases. Therefore, the impugned penalties were canceled, and all five appeals were allowed. This judgment highlights the importance of establishing a reasonable cause for non-compliance with tax provisions and the significance of interpreting relevant sections of the Income-tax Act in specific contexts, such as for Cooperative Societies claiming deductions under Section 80P.
|
