9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Challenge to Tribunal's judgment based on tax effect limit set by Board's circulars.
Summary: The High Court considered the challenge by the Revenue against the Tribunal's judgment, which dismissed the appeal on the grounds of tax effect limit set by the Board's circulars. The controversy arose when the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim made by the assessee regarding suffered loss, leading to the appeal reaching the Tribunal. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the assessee had suffered a loss, making the Revenue's appeal not competent based on the monetary limit prescribed by the Board's circular. The Court analyzed various circulars issued by the Board from 2000 to 2008, focusing on the conditions for filing appeals based on tax effect limits. It was observed that none of the circulars intended to bar tax appeals solely because the assessee had incurred a loss, even if the potential tax effect was significant. The Court emphasized that the notional tax effect must exceed the limits prescribed by the Board for such appeals to be presented. The judgment clarified that the Board's circulars did not prevent appeals in cases of loss returns, and subsequent clarifications did not change the position regarding appeals in such scenarios. Ultimately, the Court allowed the Tax Appeal, quashed the Tribunal's judgment, and remanded the proceedings for consideration on merits, holding in favor of the Revenue. The judgment highlighted the importance of notional tax effect exceeding the limits set by the Board for determining the maintainability of appeals in cases of loss returns.
|
