Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (8) TMI 1227 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Appeal by department against order of ld. CIT (A) relating to assessment year 2006-07 regarding deletion of addition u/s 50C of the Act.

Summary:
The department objected to the deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) by applying provisions of section 50C of the Act. The AO computed capital gain at Rs. 26,36,153/- but adopted deemed full value of consideration at Rs. 30,63,132/- u/s 50C. The appellant contended that since the transfer was through an unregistered agreement to sale, the question of valuation of stamp duty did not arise, making section 50C inapplicable. The appellant relied on legal precedents to support their argument. The ld. CIT (A) considered the appellant's contention and found that section 50C is a special provision for adopting full value of consideration in certain cases where stamp valuation authority assesses the value for stamp duty payment. The ld. CIT (A) allowed the appeal of the assessee on this issue, stating that the amendment to section 50C, effective from 1.10.2009, inserting the word "assessable," is not retrospective and cannot be applied to cases before that date where the property was not registered.

The department appealed to the Tribunal, with the ld. D/R relying on the AO's order and the ld. Counsel of the assessee supporting the ld. CIT (A)'s decision. The Tribunal found that the ld. CIT (A) was justified in allowing the issue in favor of the assessee, citing the decision of ITAT Jodhpur in a similar case. As there was no stamp duty imposed due to the unregistered sale deed, and the amendment to section 50C was not applicable for the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal confirmed the ld. CIT (A)'s decision in favor of the assessee. Consequently, the appeal of the department was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 05.08.2011.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates