9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Disallowance of loss on share transactions and addition under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Issue 1 - Disallowance of loss on share transactions: The assessee claimed a loss on share transactions for the assessment year 2001-02, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) based on the SEBI and JPC reports related to Ketan Parekh cases. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The appellant contended that the loss was genuine and incurred in the pursuit of business. The counsel provided detailed evidence supporting the claim, including transaction details, market losses, and bank statements. It was argued that the A.O. did not consider all evidence and made general disallowances based on group cases. The Tribunal found that the A.O. did not examine individual details of the assessee and directed a re-examination, considering the facts and giving the assessee an opportunity to present its case. The matter was restored to the A.O. for fresh assessment. Issue 2 - Addition under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act: The A.O. made an addition under section 41(1) on the grounds that a liability had ceased to exist without confirmations. The counsel argued that the addition was not justified as the liability still existed, but confirmations could not be submitted due to adverse market conditions. The Tribunal, without delving into the merits, directed the A.O. to re-examine the issue along with the quantification of loss, which was restored for fresh assessment. The A.O. was instructed to allow the assessee to make submissions, verify if the loss falls under section 73 as speculative, and consider applicable laws before making any disallowance or addition. The issue was restored to the A.O. for further examination. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough re-examination by the A.O. on both issues, considering all evidence and giving the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case.
|
