9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment deals with the deletion of additions made u/s 41(1)(a), 69C & 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act after rejection of books of account and estimation of income in the hands of the assessee.
Deletion of Additions u/s 41(1)(a): The Assessing Officer made an addition under section 41(1)(a) of the Act due to payments made by the assessee to contractors against outstanding liabilities. However, the CIT(A) deleted this addition, stating that the provisions of section 41(1)(a) were not applicable in this case as there was no cassation or remission of liability. The Tribunal found no merit in the revenue's appeal and dismissed it. Deletion of Additions u/s 69C: Another addition was made under section 69C of the Act based on the variation in reporting of cash payments by the assessee and cash receipts by the recipient. The Tribunal held that no such disallowance was warranted in the hands of the assessee, in line with established legal principles. Deletion of Additions u/s 40a(ia): The Assessing Officer disallowed a sum under section 40a(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of tax at source out of hire charges. However, the Tribunal noted that there was no regulation for deduction of tax at source out of hire charges during the relevant year. The Tribunal further emphasized that no further addition could be made in the hands of the assessee after estimating income using the net profit rate and rejecting the books of account. Legal Principles and Precedents: The Tribunal referred to various legal principles and precedents, such as the judgments of different High Courts and the Supreme Court, to support its decision to dismiss the revenue's appeal against the deletions of additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal highlighted that when books of account are rejected, no reliance can be placed on them for making additions, and that the estimation of income takes care of irregularities committed by the assessee. Conclusion: Ultimately, the Tribunal found no merit in the revenue's grounds of appeal and dismissed the appeal. The judgment was pronounced on 2nd May, 2012.
|
