9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (9) TMI 1103 - HC - Income TaxDenial of exemption under Section 10(20A) - Held that - In the instant case the object and function of incorporating the appellant-company is totally for different purpose. The appellant was incorporated pursuant to the resolution of the Government of Karnataka but not constituted under any law. It was incorporated for the purpose of achieving certain objects and cannot be equated with the authority constituted in India by or under any law enacted. Looking at the object of the appellant-company it cannot be treated as an authority under article 12 of the Constitution of India. Since they are not discharging the functions of housing accommodation and for the purpose of planning and development of the Cities towns and villages the appellant does not fall under the purview of Section 10(20A) of the Act. Hence they are not entitled to claim exemption. - Decided against assessee.
Issues:
Challenge to order denying exemption under Section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Eligibility for Exemption under Section 10(20A) of the Act The appellant, a Public Limited Company fully controlled by the Government of Karnataka, sought exemption under Section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 1998-1999 to 2000-2001. The Assessing Authority, Appellate Authority, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal all denied the exemption, concluding that the appellant did not fulfill the requirements of Section 10(20A) as they were not constituted under any law for dealing with housing accommodations or planning and development of cities, towns, and villages. The appellant argued that they were entitled to the exemption based on their activities and government control, citing a Supreme Court judgment related to a similar corporation. However, the Revenue contended that the appellant's incorporation was for industrial activities and infrastructure provision, not falling under the scope of Section 10(20A). Issue 2: Interpretation of Section 10(20A) and Relevant Case Law The Court analyzed Section 10(20A) of the Act, which provides exemption for authorities constituted in India for housing accommodation or city planning purposes. The Court emphasized the requirement that the authority must be constituted under a specific law for these purposes to qualify for exemption. The judgment referred to the case law, including a decision by the Tamil Nadu High Court, which held that an entity not constituted under a law for housing or planning purposes cannot claim the benefit under Section 10(20A). The Court agreed with this interpretation, stating that the appellant's objectives did not align with the criteria specified in the Act for exemption. Issue 3: Consideration of Appellant's Activities and Government Control The Court examined the appellant's activities related to small scale industries, industrial estates, financial assistance, and product marketing, noting the government's promotion and control over the company. Despite the government's involvement, the Court determined that the appellant's incorporation did not meet the legal requirements for exemption under Section 10(20A) due to the specific purposes outlined in the Act. The Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing that the appellant's functions did not fall within the scope of the exemption provision. Conclusion: The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant did not qualify for exemption under Section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act based on the specific legal criteria and purpose of the appellant's incorporation. The judgment highlighted the importance of fulfilling the statutory requirements for claiming tax exemptions under the Act, emphasizing the need for alignment between an entity's objectives and the provisions of the law to qualify for tax benefits.
|
