Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2013 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (5) TMI 960 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A) for A.Y. 2009-10, involving computation of book profits u/s 115JB and depreciation on computer peripherals.

Issue 1 - Computation of Book Profits u/s 115JB:
- The assessee company declared a loss in the relevant assessment year.
- AO completed the assessment u/s 115JB without deducting any carried forward unabsorbed depreciation or business loss.
- Ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to verify and allow the benefit of minimum of brought forward business loss or depreciation while computing the book profit u/s 115JB.
- Department appealed against this decision, questioning the allowance of business loss and depreciation.
- The contention was that the company was not entitled to carry forward business loss due to a change in shareholding pattern.
- Ld. Counsel argued that sec. 79 does not apply to the computation of book profits u/s 115JB.
- Tribunal found that the AO did not disallow the claim under sec. 79 but due to lack of details of business loss in the return.
- Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the book profits after verifying the correct figures of brought forward business loss or depreciation.

Issue 2 - Depreciation on Computer Peripherals:
- AO disallowed 60% depreciation claimed by the assessee on UPS, allowing only 15%.
- Ld. CIT(A) relied on a Delhi High Court decision allowing 60% depreciation on computer peripherals.
- Tribunal dismissed the appeal on this ground, following the High Court decision.

Separate Judgment by Judges:
- No separate judgment delivered by the judges.

Conclusion:
- The appeal by the Department and cross objection by the assessee were dismissed.
- The order was pronounced on 31/05/2013.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates