9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Settlement agreement between parties, payment terms, protection of appellant's interests, potential contempt of court action.
The High Court of Delhi, in a case involving a settlement agreement, upheld the impugned order which required the appellant to pay a sum of `45.50 crores along with interest in installments over a specified period. The appellant raised concerns regarding potential consequences for defaulting on payments, but the Court noted that the appellant's interests were protected by certain conditions, including non-disclosure of the order in the media. The Court declined to interfere with the order, stating that any requests for clarification or modification could be addressed to the Company Court. The appeal was disposed of without issuing any notice, and pending applications were also disposed of. In summary, the judgment focused on the enforcement of a settlement agreement, payment terms, protection of appellant's interests, and the procedure for seeking clarification or modification of the order. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the terms agreed upon by the parties and provided a pathway for addressing any concerns or requests for changes through the appropriate legal channels.
|
