9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether debentures issued to public financial institutions qualify as issued to the "public" u/r 1(iv) of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act. 2. Whether the option for early redemption of debentures affects their inclusion in the capital base. 3. Whether the assessee-company is entitled to include 49% of debentures subscribed by I.C.I.C.I. and L.I.C. in its capital base. 4. Whether the Tribunal was justified in reconsidering the inclusion of debentures under rule 1(v) after holding they were not issued to the public. Summary: Issue 1: Debentures Issued to Public Financial Institutions The court examined whether debentures issued to financial institutions could be considered as issued to the "public" within the meaning of rule 1(iv) of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act. The court concluded that debentures issued to financial institutions did not form part of any "public issue" and thus could not be considered as issued to the public. Therefore, rule 1(iv) was deemed inapplicable. Issue 2: Early Redemption Option The court considered whether the option for debenture holders to redeem debentures before the expiry of seven years affected their inclusion in the capital base. It was held that the mere option for early redemption did not necessitate repayment within a period of less than seven years. If the option to convert debentures into equity was exercised, the company was not required to repay the loan, and the debentures would convert into equity, forming part of the paid-up capital. Issue 3: Inclusion of Debentures in Capital Base The court addressed whether the assessee-company was entitled to include 49% of the debentures subscribed by I.C.I.C.I. and L.I.C. in its capital base. The court held that the debentures of Rs. 60 lakhs (Rs. 30 lakhs each from I.C.I.C.I. and L.I.C.) were includible in their entirety in the capital base for surtax purposes, not merely 49% thereof. Issue 4: Reconsideration Under Rule 1(v) The court examined whether the Tribunal was justified in reconsidering the inclusion of debentures under rule 1(v) after holding they were not issued to the public. The court held that rule 1(v) applies to all borrowings from specified financial institutions, including those supported by debentures, provided they are for the creation of a capital asset and are not repayable within less than seven years. Thus, the Tribunal was justified in considering the inclusion under rule 1(v). Conclusion: - Question 1: Answered in the affirmative, in favor of the Revenue. - Question 2: Answered in the negative, in favor of the assessee. - Question 3: The assessee is entitled to inclusion of debentures of Rs. 60 lakhs in its capital base for surtax purposes, in entirety. - Question 4: Answered in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee. No order as to costs.
|
