Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2017 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (7) TMI 1111 - AT - Service TaxCENVAT credit - outdoor catering service by the employer within the factory premises - Held that - Since there is divergence of view in the Benches of Tribunal on the very same issue, the matter should be referred to President for constituting a Larger Bench and settling the law on the issue - matter referred to Larger Bench.
Issues involved:
Availability of CENVAT Credit on service tax paid for "outdoor catering service" - Need for referral to a Larger Bench due to conflicting views in different Tribunal cases. Analysis: The case revolves around the availability of CENVAT Credit on the Service Tax paid for "outdoor catering service." The appellant, an industrial unit, engaged in manufacturing/service provision, availed the services of outdoor catering for their employees and claimed CENVAT credit on the Service Tax charged. The Department contends that post the amendment to Rule 2(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the credit for "outdoor catering service" cannot be availed. This disagreement forms the crux of the issue. The appellant's counsel relies on a previous Tribunal judgment in the case of M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that canteen services provided within factory premises, in compliance with the Factories Act, 1948, are eligible for credit on service tax paid. This judgment supports the appellant's position regarding the availability of CENVAT credit for catering services. Contrarily, another Tribunal case involving AET Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. presented a different perspective. In this case, post the amendment to Rule 2(1) of CCR, 2004, it was concluded that CENVAT credit cannot be allowed for "outdoor catering service." The divergence in views between these two Tribunal cases highlights the need for a resolution. Given the conflicting decisions in different Tribunal cases on the same issue, the Member (J) finds it appropriate to refer the matter to the President for the constitution of a Larger Bench. The objective is to address the disparity and establish a coherent interpretation of the law regarding the availability of CENVAT Credit on Service Tax paid for "outdoor catering service." The order was pronounced on 24-7-2017, emphasizing the significance of resolving this legal ambiguity through a Larger Bench.
|