Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2010 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (9) TMI 426 - AT - Customs


Issues:
1. Confiscation of imported scrap by the Commissioner.
2. Imposition of penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 for non-accompaniment of pre-shipment inspection certificate.

Analysis:
1. The judgment involves the confiscation of imported scrap by the Commissioner from various appellants, including M/s. Sameer Industries, M/s. Raja Zinc Pvt. Ltd., and M/s. Metal Link Alloys Pvt. Ltd. The Commissioner confiscated copper cable scrap and plastic scrap based on lack of valid import licenses and non-compliance with Hazardous Waste Rules. The appellants argued that registration with CPCB exempted them from the need for import licenses. The Tribunal found merit in the appellants' contentions and set aside the confiscation of certain scrap items while upholding the confiscation of plastic scrap due to the absence of a required license.

2. Regarding penalties imposed for non-production of pre-shipment inspection certificates, the appellants contended that most consignments were imported before the circular mandating such certificates. Citing precedents and the absence of war material in the imports, the Tribunal set aside the penalties, considering the timing of imports in relation to the circular and the lack of evidence of prohibited items. The judgment reduced redemption fines and penalties for certain appellants while overturning penalties for non-compliance with pre-shipment inspection certificate requirements.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the confiscation of certain scrap items while reducing redemption fines and penalties for non-compliance. The judgment provided detailed reasoning for each issue involved, considering legal provisions, precedents, and specific circumstances of each appellant's case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates