9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (10) TMI 496 - HC - Income TaxDeduction u/s 80HHC - whether the scrap which had been generated during the manufacturing process and was sold in the domestic market would form part of the total turnover - 100% EOU - The Kerala High Court taking a similar view in Kar Mobiles case 2010 -TMI - 203811 - Kerala High Court - Held that Once an element of sale is involved in the case of scrap, it would fall in a separate category and cannot be excluded from total turnover which shall increase the denominator of the formula for determining the extent of the benefit admissible to an assessee under section 80HHC of the Act - whereas excise duty, sales tax, commission and miscellaneous income shall not be part of the total turnover for calculating the benefit of deduction under section 80HHC - Decided against the assessee
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the sale of scrap in India should be included in the total turnover for the purposes of calculating deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Inclusion of Sale of Scrap in Total Turnover for Section 80HHC Deduction Background: The Revenue appealed against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's decision, which excluded the sale of scrap from the total turnover for calculating the deduction under section 80HHC. The assessee, a 100% export-oriented unit, did not include the sale of scrap in the total turnover, arguing that it was incidental to the manufacturing process and not part of the export business. Revenue's Argument: The Revenue contended that as per section 80HHC and its Explanation, the Assessing Officer correctly included the sale of scrap in the total turnover. They cited judgments from the Karnataka High Court (CIT v. Motor Industries Co. Ltd.) and the Kerala High Court (CIT v. Kar Mobiles Ltd.) to support their stance. Assessee's Argument: The assessee relied on various judgments, including those from the Madras High Court (CIT v. Madras Motors Ltd., CIT v. Wheels India Ltd., CIT v. Sundaram Clayton Ltd., CIT v. Shiva Distilleries Ltd., CIT v. Ashok Leyland Ltd.) and the Delhi High Court (CIT v. Punjab Stainless Steel Ind.), which excluded scrap sales from total turnover for section 80HHC calculations. Legal Provisions: Section 80HHC(3) and its Explanations define "export turnover" and "total turnover." The terms exclude freight or insurance but include all sale proceeds related to the business. Judicial Interpretations: - The Madras High Court in Madras Motors Ltd. and subsequent cases excluded excise duty, sales tax, and scrap sales from total turnover for section 80HHC. - The Delhi High Court in Punjab Stainless Steel Ind. held that scrap sales were not incidental to export activity and should not be included in total turnover. - The Supreme Court in Lakshmi Machine Works excluded excise duty and sales tax from total turnover, emphasizing that only receipts with profit elements should be included. Contrary Views: - The Karnataka High Court in Motor Industries Co. Ltd. included scrap sales in total turnover, arguing that the definitions of "export turnover" and "total turnover" are distinct and scrap sales form part of domestic turnover. - The Kerala High Court in Kar Mobiles Ltd. held that scrap sales, being part of the manufacturing process, should be included in total turnover. High Court's Decision: The court agreed with the Karnataka and Kerala High Courts, stating that the sale of scrap involves an element of sale and should be included in the total turnover. This increases the denominator in the formula for section 80HHC deductions, thereby reducing the benefit. Conclusion: The appeals were allowed, and the substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the Revenue. The sale of scrap in the domestic market should be included in the total turnover for calculating the deduction under section 80HHC.
|
