2011 (5) TMI 353 - HC - Indian Laws

Simultaneous continuation of the disciplinary proceedings and criminal proceedings - statutory auditors of M/s. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. (SCSL). - (a) Are the charges on which the disciplinary proceedings are proposed to be held identical or nearly similar to the charges on which they are facing criminal proceedings? (b) Are the criminal charges of a grave nature? (c) Do the charges involve complicated questions of law and fact? - Held that - On a perusal of the comparative chart of the charges levelled in the disciplinary proceeding and the chargesheet in the criminal proceeding, the list of witnesses, the nature of enquiry, the purpose of enquiry and arraigning the appellants as accused persons in the criminal case are on a different base. The theory of prejudice that has been canvassed is not to be routinely inferred. It cannot be held in the obtaining factual matrix, that participation of the applicants in the departmental enquiry would seriously prejudice the defence at the trial in the criminal case. - ICAI to proceed with the departmental enquiry keeping in view the convenience of the appellants and affording them adequate opportunity to put forth their case from all spectrums.

Issues Involved:
1. Simultaneous continuation of disciplinary proceedings and criminal trial.
2. Allegations of professional misconduct against the appellants.
3. Allegations of criminal offenses against the appellants.
4. Potential prejudice to the appellants' defense in the criminal trial due to ongoing disciplinary proceedings.
5. The legal framework governing the disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Simultaneous Continuation of Disciplinary Proceedings and Criminal Trial:
The court examined whether the disciplinary proceedings against the appellants should be stayed pending the conclusion of the criminal trial. The appellants argued that the charges in both proceedings were identical, and continuing both simultaneously would prejudice their defense in the criminal trial. The court noted that there is no legal bar to conducting both proceedings simultaneously, though it may not be advisable in certain situations where criminal charges are grave and involve complicated questions of law and fact. The court emphasized that the decision to stay disciplinary proceedings should consider the facts and circumstances of each case.

2. Allegations of Professional Misconduct Against the Appellants:
The appellants, chartered accountants, were accused of professional misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The allegations included failure to exercise due diligence, negligence in auditing, and certifying falsified financial statements of Satyam Computer Services Ltd. (SCSL). The disciplinary committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) formed a prima facie opinion that the appellants were guilty of professional misconduct and issued notices for disciplinary proceedings.

3. Allegations of Criminal Offenses Against the Appellants:
The appellants were also facing criminal charges, including cheating, criminal conspiracy, and fraud, under sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 477A, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The criminal charges were based on the same set of facts as the disciplinary proceedings, with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) alleging that the appellants conspired with the management of SCSL to falsify financial statements and mislead shareholders and investors.

4. Potential Prejudice to the Appellants' Defense in the Criminal Trial:
The appellants contended that continuing the disciplinary proceedings would compel them to disclose their defense in the criminal trial, causing prejudice. The court acknowledged this concern but noted that the standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings is different from that in criminal trials. The court found that the appellants had not demonstrated how the continuation of disciplinary proceedings would cause serious prejudice to their defense in the criminal trial.

5. The Legal Framework Governing the Disciplinary Proceedings Under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949:
The court analyzed the provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which governs the disciplinary proceedings against chartered accountants. The Act aims to maintain high standards of professional conduct and integrity. The court emphasized that the disciplinary proceedings serve a different purpose than criminal trials, focusing on maintaining the integrity of the profession rather than punishing criminal behavior.

Conclusion:
The court concluded that there was no justification to stay the disciplinary proceedings against the appellants. The charges in the disciplinary proceedings and the criminal trial were distinct, and the appellants had not demonstrated that continuing both proceedings would cause serious prejudice to their defense in the criminal trial. The court directed the ICAI to proceed with the disciplinary proceedings while ensuring that the appellants were given adequate opportunities to present their case, considering their involvement in the ongoing criminal trial. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.

← Previous Next →