9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (3) TMI 1034 - AT - Income TaxDTAA - Royalty - whether the service charges received by the assessee from various T.V. Channels on account of providing facility of broadcasting their programmes through the transponders located in the satellites are taxable in India - Held that - As in the light of the fact that the facts of the present case are identical to that of the case decided in the case of Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. 2002 (11) TMI 263 - ITAT DELHI-C and respectfully following the decision of Hon ble High Court of Delhi in the above referred case of Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. (2011 (1) TMI 47 - DELHI HIGH COURT) the service charges received by the assessee from various TV channels on account of providing facility of broadcasting their programmes through the transponders located in the satellites are not liable to be taxed as royalty in India. In favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of service charges received by the assessee from various TV channels for broadcasting through transponders located in satellites. 2. Interpretation of the term "royalty" under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and its applicability to the assessee's case. 3. Application of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Thailand. Detailed Analysis: 1. Taxability of Service Charges: The primary issue in these appeals is whether the service charges received by the assessee from various TV channels for providing broadcasting facilities through transponders located in satellites are taxable in India. The assessee, a resident of Thailand, provides TV channels with the facility of broadcasting their programs through transponders located in satellites owned by the Government of Thailand. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] held that these service charges are taxable in India, relying on the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal's decision in the case of Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. 2. Interpretation of "Royalty" under Section 9(1)(vi): The AO and CIT(A) based their decision on the interpretation that the payment for the use of transponders is covered under Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which defines "royalty." The Tribunal's earlier decision in the case of Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. had held that such payments are considered royalty. However, this decision was reversed by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, which held that the amounts received by Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. are not taxable in India as royalty. The High Court concluded that the control of the satellite or the transponder remains with the satellite operator, and the customers are merely given access to the transponder capacity, not utilizing the process or equipment involved in its operations. 3. Application of DTAA between India and Thailand: The CIT(A) also observed that the judgment in the case of Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. is fully applicable to the assessee's case and that the receipts from various channels constitute royalty under both the Income-tax Act and the DTAA between India and Thailand. However, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's decision in the Asia Satellite case clarified that such receipts do not fall within the definition of royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) and are not taxable in India. Conclusion: After hearing both parties and considering the facts of the case, the Tribunal found that the facts of the present case are identical to those in the Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. case. The Tribunal noted that the Delhi High Court had reversed the Tribunal's earlier decision and held that the service charges received by the assessee for providing broadcasting facilities through transponders are not taxable as royalty in India. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A) and deleted the additions made by the AO on this account. All the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, following the precedent set by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. case.
|
