9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (3) TMI 1265 - HC - Income TaxRegistration u/s 12A - Agricultural Market Committee (AMC), constituted u/s 4(1) of the AMC Act was availing exemption as a local authority - Revenue contended that AMCs cannot be given the benefit of exemption, which have been permitted u/s 10(20) prior to amendment w.e.f. April 1, 2003 - Revenue also contended that said AMC does not come within the expression person and does not exist for charitable purpose - Held that - In Gujarat Maritime Board 2007 (12) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA it has been held that section 10(20) and section 11 operate in totally different spheres, that even if the Board has ceased to be local authority , it is not precluded from claiming exemption u/s 11(1) . Thus accordingly hold that an AMC is entitled to seek exemption u/s 10(20) r.w.s. 10(29) till March 31, 2003. By reason of the amendment to section 10(20) and deletion of section 10(29) w.e.f. from April 1, 2003, they, for the purpose of the Income-tax Act, ceased to be local authorities . This itself would not disqualify them from claiming exemption u/s 11(1) and 12 provided they are considered as institutions established for advancement of objects of general public utility. Applying the law, as laid down by the Supreme Court in the above cited precedents, we are convinced that an AMC, constituted under the enactment of the State Legislature, is deriving income from property held under legal obligation for a charitable purpose to wit the advancement of general object of utility. It is, therefore, entitled to be registered u/s 12A/12AA to enable an AMC to claim exemption as per law. Therefore, denial of registration to the agricultural market committees constituted u/s 4(1) of the Andhra Pradesh (Agri-cultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 is erroneous and ITAT has correctly applied the law in reversing the decision of the CIT.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether an Agricultural Market Committee (AMC) constituted under the AMC Act is an institution for charitable purposes. 2. Whether AMCs qualify as "persons" under the Income-tax Act. 3. The effect of the Finance Act, 2002, on AMCs' tax exemption status. 4. Whether AMCs can be considered charitable institutions for tax exemption purposes. 5. The likelihood of AMCs' non-compliance with investment requirements under section 11(5) of the Income-tax Act. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Whether an Agricultural Market Committee (AMC) constituted under the AMC Act is an institution for charitable purposes: The core question was whether AMCs, constituted under section 4(1) of the AMC Act, qualify as institutions for charitable purposes under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act. The judgment concluded that AMCs are indeed institutions established for the advancement of general public utility and thus exist for charitable purposes. The court emphasized that AMCs provide essential market facilities to agriculturists, ensuring fair prices and eliminating middlemen, which aligns with the definition of charitable purposes. 2. Whether AMCs qualify as "persons" under the Income-tax Act: The court analyzed section 2(31) of the Income-tax Act, which defines "person" inclusively, covering natural and juristic persons. AMCs, being bodies corporate with perpetual succession and common seals, fall within the category of artificial juridical persons. Thus, AMCs qualify as "persons" under the Income-tax Act, enabling them to seek registration under section 12A. 3. The effect of the Finance Act, 2002, on AMCs' tax exemption status: Prior to the Finance Act, 2002, AMCs enjoyed tax exemption as "local authorities" under section 10(20) and section 10(29). However, the Finance Act, 2002, amended section 10(20) and deleted section 10(29), restricting the definition of "local authority" and excluding AMCs. Despite this, the court held that AMCs could still seek exemption under sections 11 and 12, as these provisions operate independently of section 10(20). The court cited the Supreme Court's decision in Gujarat Maritime Board, which supported the view that entities could claim exemption under section 11(1) even if they ceased to be local authorities. 4. Whether AMCs can be considered charitable institutions for tax exemption purposes: The court examined the functions and duties of AMCs under the AMC Act and concluded that they serve the public utility by providing essential market facilities to farmers and agriculturists. The court referenced several precedents, including Andhra Chamber of Commerce, Surat Art Silk, and APSRTC, which established that institutions promoting general public utility qualify as charitable purposes. The court affirmed that AMCs, by advancing the object of general public utility, are entitled to registration under section 12A/12AA for tax exemption. 5. The likelihood of AMCs' non-compliance with investment requirements under section 11(5) of the Income-tax Act: The senior counsel for the Revenue argued that AMCs might not comply with section 11(5) investment requirements. However, the court clarified that at the time of considering registration under section 12A, the Commissioner should focus on the trust's objects and genuineness, not future compliance with investment norms. The court also noted that AMCs' funds, as mandated by the AMC Act, are deposited in scheduled banks, aligning with section 11(5)(iii) requirements. Conclusion: The court held that denying registration to AMCs under section 12A was erroneous, and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal correctly reversed the Commissioner's decision. The appeals were dismissed, affirming that AMCs qualify as institutions for charitable purposes and are entitled to tax exemption under sections 11 and 12.
|
