9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (4) TMI 214 - HC - Income TaxMain object of the Assessee is to promote sports and athletic activities - AO denied the exemption claimed under Section 11 treating the Assessee as a mutual concern and the facilities for the promotion of sports are provided to a limited group of people, being the members of the club - Commissioner (Appeals) concluded that the promotion of sports and games fell within the purview of Section 2 (15) since it constituted an advancement of any other object of general pubic utility and directed AO to grant exemption u/s 11 - revenue appeals against the CIT(A) - Held that - the fact that the membership of the club is open to a section of the community doesn t mean that the club has been constituted for the advancement of any other object of general public utility - AO did not have an occasion to consider the application of the funds as per Section 11, since he had come to the conclusion that the Assessee does not fulfill the charitable purpose as defined in Section 2(15) hence remit the proceedings back to the AO to determine whether the requirements of Section 11 have been duly fulfilled as regards the application of the funds - Appeal of revenue disposed off as the Assessee is a Charitable Institution
Issues:
1. Exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Classification of the Assessee as a mutual concern or charitable institution. 3. Application of the principle of mutuality. 4. Taxability of income from non-members. 5. Consideration of funds application under Section 11. Exemption under Section 11: The appeal questioned the ITAT's decision directing the AO to grant exemption under Section 11, disregarding the AO's reasoning. The Assessee, registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, aimed to promote sports and athletic activities. The AO initially denied the exemption under Section 11, treating the Assessee as a mutual concern. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal found in favor of the Assessee, noting that the promotion of sports falls under the advancement of general public utility. The Court, in a similar case, emphasized that club membership being open to a section of the community does not negate the charitable nature of the club. The Court remanded the proceedings to the AO to assess the funds' application under Section 11. Classification of the Assessee: The issue of whether the Assessee is a mutual concern or a charitable institution was crucial. The AO initially treated the Assessee as a mutual concern, denying exemption under Section 11. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, highlighting the public utility aspect of promoting sports and games. The Court concurred, holding that the Assessee is a Charitable Institution, thereby rendering questions related to mutuality and taxability of income from non-members irrelevant. Application of the Principle of Mutuality: The ITAT's decision was challenged regarding the principle of mutuality and the violation of Section 13 disentitling the trust from claiming exemption under Section 11. However, the Court's ruling that the Assessee is a Charitable Institution resolved this issue, making it unnecessary to delve into the principle of mutuality further. Taxability of Income from Non-Members: The ITAT's decision to grant relief to the Assessee on income from other sources, earned from non-members, was questioned. However, the Court's classification of the Assessee as a Charitable Institution rendered this issue moot, as the Assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 11 regardless of the source of income. Consideration of Funds Application under Section 11: The Court remitted the proceedings back to the Assessing Officer to determine if the requirements of Section 11 had been met concerning the application of funds. This step was necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of Section 11 and to verify that the funds were being utilized for charitable purposes effectively. In conclusion, the Court disposed of the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to review the application of funds under Section 11 promptly. The decision confirmed the Assessee's status as a Charitable Institution, settling the issues related to mutuality and income taxability from non-members.
|
